The Covenant Gap in SBA 7(a)
Financial covenants are a standard part of commercial lending; most bank loans require borrowers to maintain certain financial ratios after closing. If performance slips, covenants allow the lender to spot potential problems early. These ratios often include liquidity requirements, leverage limits, or debt service coverage testing.
SBA 7(a) lending works differently.
In most cases, there are no ongoing financial maintenance covenants after closing. So what does that mean in practice?
Why Covenants Exist in the First Place |
Financial covenants allow lenders to monitor risk after a loan closes. They create checkpoints that signal when a borrower’s financial condition may be weakening.
In conventional lending, covenants typically serve a few purposes:
Early warning signals when financial performance begins to deteriorate
Regular financial reporting that keeps lenders informed
Defined triggers for lender intervention before payments are missed
In short, covenants help lenders identify problems before payments are missed and the loan actually goes into default.
So What Happens in SBA 7(a)?
In the majority of SBA 7(a) loans, between 90-95%, there are no ongoing financial maintenance covenants after closing.
As long as payments continue to be made, the loan is generally considered satisfactory and not in default.
What This Means for the Borrower
Without financial covenants, borrower behavior often looks different than in conventional lending.
Seller notes on standby or subordination, often start getting paid once cash flow stabilizes
When performance declines, borrowers may inject personal funds to keep payments current
Additional debt is sometimes layered in to manage short-term liquidity issues or even to cover the SBA loan payment itself.
This results in a structure where the payment history can look perfectly fine, even while the borrower drifts outside the original approved credit structure.
My View From the Deal Desk |
Freedom Cuts Both Ways
Most SBA 7(a) loans do not operate under ongoing financial covenants after closing. That gives borrowers real flexibility. A business can experience weak cash flow without immediately triggering a covenant breach.
But the same flexibility also means issues inside the business may develop without being flagged the way they might be in a conventional loan structure.
Payment Becomes the Covenant
Without covenants, the loan is often judged by something much simpler: whether the payment is being made. If the borrower continues making the payment, the loan is generally viewed as performing. In many ways, the payment itself becomes the covenant.
Default Is Default
But make no mistake. A loan being current does not mean it is in compliance.
In my experience, borrowers often drift outside of the approved credit structure. Seller notes that were supposed to remain on standby get paid. Collateral gets sold. Ownership changes occur without the proper notifications or approvals.
None of that shows up in the payment history. From the outside, the loan can look perfectly fine. But if problems eventually surface in the business or the borrower’s personal situation, those details matter.
P.S. If you know a business owner, CPA, banker, broker, or attorney who might find this useful, feel free to pass it along. They can subscribe here.
